USA Midterms....

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

BoldonLad

Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
Location
South Tyneside
Even the faintest notion that the church (or the mainstream ones at least) embraces socialism in any way is risible.

Is there ANY religion which embraces socialism? I can’t think of one, but, as a non-believer, I am not exactly an expert on religion.
 

All uphill

Active Member
Is there ANY religion which embraces socialism? I can’t think of one, but, as a non-believer, I am not exactly an expert on religion.

I'm a non believer but I'd say the message of Jesus was pretty socialist - looking after the poor and vulnerable, for example. His attitude to women was pretty positive too.

Of course the organised churches took that message and used it to hoard wealth and power, controlling the lives of millions.
 

BoldonLad

Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
Location
South Tyneside
I'm a non believer but I'd say the message of Jesus was pretty socialist - looking after the poor and vulnerable, for example. His attitude to women was pretty positive too.

Of course the organised churches took that message and used it to hoard wealth and power, controlling the lives of millions.

Wouldn’t disagree with that, but, not sure I believe all the Jesus stuff, as we are presented with it.
 

AndyRM

Elder Goth
I'm a non believer but I'd say the message of Jesus was pretty socialist - looking after the poor and vulnerable, for example. His attitude to women was pretty positive too.

Of course the organised churches took that message and used it to hoard wealth and power, controlling the lives of millions.

This.
 

ebikeerwidnes

Well-Known Member
I'm a non believer but I'd say the message of Jesus was pretty socialist - looking after the poor and vulnerable, for example. His attitude to women was pretty positive too.

Of course the organised churches took that message and used it to hoard wealth and power, controlling the lives of millions.

Yes - but a lot of the "gospels" were totally destroyed - probably
the Church seems to work more on the basis of the works of Paul rather than Jesus in terms of organisation and worship

apparently there were a lot of more left wing "Books" - I think the Gnostic versions of Christianity used them
but they were deemed heretical

I do wonder if any ancient version of "unknown" books are lying deep in the depth of the Vatican library
 

ebikeerwidnes

Well-Known Member
In terms of left wing stuff
I have come across quite a few Church people that are very left wing - but at the low levels in the hierarchy - to get higher you seem to have to do more of the other stuff

for example - we used to go on holiday in the very South of Ireland when I was a kid
we did a lot of fishing and caught far more than we could use - the rest was dumped on the pier in old bags and left
at some point a local would appear a vehicel and take it to the local church where the Priest organised it ll to be preserved and kept in the cellars
Then over the winter he would distribute ti to the needy - apparently with no regard to their visits to the Church or anything - just based on need

kinda like a Foodbank
He was very well thought of
and there are others


but then there are some Priest - well you know the rest

I think it happens in a lot of religions - to get to the top it is difficult - or nearly impossible - to stick to the message of the founder

anyway - enough woffle
 
Of course the organised churches took that message and used it to hoard wealth and power, controlling the lives of millions.

It seems to be human nature that when movements make the move from small scale endeavours into large scale long term enterprises the opportunity for personal power and wealth proves too hard to resist. It applies to practically every religion and every political movement, regardless of the original good intentions.
 

icowden

Legendary Member
Jainism and Buddhism come close.

Probably because the Dharmic religions are more about self-improvement and self management than coercive control.

It's the Abrahamic religions that tend to be the problem as they essentially take a simple doctrine and then use that to coercively control a group of people. It's entirely based around "do this or bad things will happen to you" - a position that you won't find in Jesus's teachings.

The Dharmic religions don't require you to join in or believe in anything. It's about you yourself finding ways to be at peace with yourself. You can come and go as you please.

Abrahamic religions require that you are a believer in whichever one true religion you believe in and destroy anyone who isn't in your religion and / or cannot be converted to it. It's not about belief, it's about control.
 

All uphill

Active Member
Probably because the Dharmic religions are more about self-improvement and self management than coercive control.

It's the Abrahamic religions that tend to be the problem as they essentially take a simple doctrine and then use that to coercively control a group of people. It's entirely based around "do this or bad things will happen to you" - a position that you won't find in Jesus's teachings.

The Dharmic religions don't require you to join in or believe in anything. It's about you yourself finding ways to be at peace with yourself. You can come and go as you please.

Abrahamic religions require that you are a believer in whichever one true religion you believe in and destroy anyone who isn't in your religion and / or cannot be converted to it. It's not about belief, it's about control.

Great post.

Reminds me of Sunday School - being told about gentle Jesus, meek and mild. He seemed pretty cool, until I approached confirmation and was told of all the (enjoyable) things I mustn't do, and told about all the old men in gowns I had to respect. Psshaww!
 
Top Bottom