stowie
Active Member
Are they even in Europe?
I thought that was asia.
According to Wikipedia it spans Europe and Asia.
Maybe the EU will end up having the same definition of Europe as the Eurovision song contest.
Are they even in Europe?
I thought that was asia.
It’s all about self identification now. After all, the UK has come out as Pacific rather than Atlantic and applied to join the CPTPP.According to Wikipedia it spans Europe and Asia.
Maybe the EU will end up having the same definition of Europe as the Eurovision song contest.
Apparently polls are now showing widespread support in Finland and Sweden for joining NATO.It has been reported that Georgia will be submitting a bid for EU membership on Thursday.
I cannot think Putin was expecting the consequences of his invasion.
So the question then remains, will the west also watch as they are bombed before joining Nato? While Russia threath to nuclear bomb anyone who isn't playing their game?Apparently polls are now showing widespread support in Finland and Sweden for joining NATO.
He hasn't threathened anyone though, just put out a message about putting the big nuclear boys on special alert. Meanwhile, he's NATO's and EU's greatest recruiter.So the question then remains, will the west also watch as they are bombed before joining Nato? While Russia threath to nuclear bomb anyone who isn't playing their game?
So the question then remains, will the west also watch as they are bombed before joining Nato? While Russia threath to nuclear bomb anyone who isn't playing their game?
Surely we can do better than this lazy euphemism?I think this puts some perspective on the line of thinking that this is all down to the West poking the Russian bear.
except for the European Defence Agency which so many kippers objected to, and the related agencies and services formed after the EU took on the old WEU functions. Denmark is the only opt-out of common defence. Finland and Sweden joined.Finland and Sweden are part of the EU. Although not a defense / military organisation, [...]
I dislike it too, like 'thowing the baby out with the bathwater'.Surely we can do better than this lazy euphemism? [poking the Russian bear]
I think following the breakup of the Soviet Union there was a chance to integrate Russia into a democratic way of life under the rule of law. This extended perhaps for some 15 years after 1991. It was squandered by the West who did little to help the countries of eastern Europe to dismantle the failed socialist command economies and replace it with a social market economy. They were left to flounder. The Americans in particular should take responsibility for assuming that 'the market' minus the social aspect would automatically sort out all of the inherited problems.How about Putin and some of his actions?
except for the European Defence Agency which so many kippers objected to, and the related agencies and services formed after the EU took on the old WEU functions. Denmark is the only opt-out of common defence. Finland and Sweden joined.
Article 42.7 of the Lisbon Treaty resembles NATO Article 5.Finland and Sweden are part of the EU. Although not a defense / military organisation, this would have profound consequences to the integrity of the EU which would reverberate around the world. As terrible as it is to say, I would image an invasion into EU nation states would trigger a much wider war in a similar way to an attack on a NATO country.
Since France has nuclear missiles, an attack on any EU member state would be liable to start a nuclear war.If a Member State is the victim of armed aggression on its territory, the other Member States shall have towards it an obligation of aid and assistance by all the means in their power, in accordance with Article 51 of the United Nations Charter. This shall not prejudice the specific character of the security and defence policy of certain Member States.
Commitments and cooperation in this area shall be consistent with commitments under the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, which, for those States which are members of it, remains the foundation of their collective defence and the forum for its implementation.
Correction Putin has put the Nuclear boys on special alert, his Foreign ministers is constanly saying ''a WW3 would be nuclear and devastating'' so techniucally not a threat, but it is a bit the same as someone saying ''i have put extra big tyres on my car to over-run persons on cycles, and then continueing to close-pass person on a cycle.He hasn't threathened anyone though, just put out a message about putting the big nuclear boys on special alert. Meanwhile, he's NATO's and EU's greatest recruiter.
Yes that where the ''Russian is the biggest recruiter rumors come from'' but the question is would it really happen? considering how mild the reaction is now after a few tiny vieled russian threaths that we technically can't call that way?Finland and Sweden are part of the EU. Although not a defense / military organisation, this would have profound consequences to the integrity of the EU which would reverberate around the world. As terrible as it is to say, I would image an invasion into EU nation states would trigger a much wider war in a similar way to an attack on a NATO country.
And the Uk altough not Eu anymore where still Nato as far as i'm aware. Having said that, would it really lead to an armed conflict of will economic sanctions do? Just as we apparently think that going to stop Russia in Ukraine..Article 42.7 of the Lisbon Treaty resembles NATO Article 5.
Since France has nuclear missiles, an attack on any EU member state would be liable to start a nuclear war.
Then an attack on France, or indeed any joint EU-NATO member, would pull us and the US in.