War with Russia

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
According to Wikipedia it spans Europe and Asia.

Maybe the EU will end up having the same definition of Europe as the Eurovision song contest.
It’s all about self identification now. After all, the UK has come out as Pacific rather than Atlantic and applied to join the CPTPP.
 

the snail

Active Member
It has been reported that Georgia will be submitting a bid for EU membership on Thursday.

I cannot think Putin was expecting the consequences of his invasion.
Apparently polls are now showing widespread support in Finland and Sweden for joining NATO.
 

stowie

Active Member
So the question then remains, will the west also watch as they are bombed before joining Nato? While Russia threath to nuclear bomb anyone who isn't playing their game?

Finland and Sweden are part of the EU. Although not a defense / military organisation, this would have profound consequences to the integrity of the EU which would reverberate around the world. As terrible as it is to say, I would image an invasion into EU nation states would trigger a much wider war in a similar way to an attack on a NATO country.
 

Unkraut

Master of the Inane Comment
Location
Germany
I have just heard in the latest discussion programme on the war and Putin that in re-equipping and modernising the Russian forces over the last 15 years or so, the Russians have installed rockets in the Kaliningrad region, formerly Königsberg in the old East Prussia. These could be fitted with nuclear warheads, and could reach most of the capital cities in western Europe.

I think this puts some perspective on the line of thinking that this is all down to the West poking the Russian bear.
 
I think this puts some perspective on the line of thinking that this is all down to the West poking the Russian bear.
Surely we can do better than this lazy euphemism?

How about Putin and some of his actions? Ordering political opponents and those who dare criticise him to be poisoned by agents in our and other countries? How about Putin funding opponents of the EU (Banks, Farage, Galloway, Fox) and interfering in elections? How about Putin funding cyber attacks on organisations in this country and the West not to mention the continuous wave of misinformation coming from Putin's bot and troll factories which is saturating social media?

Is it any wonder that democratically elected governments in former Eastern block countries, and those bordering Putin's Russia, want to join the EU and/or Nato?
 
Last edited:

mjr

Active Member
Finland and Sweden are part of the EU. Although not a defense / military organisation, [...]
except for the European Defence Agency which so many kippers objected to, and the related agencies and services formed after the EU took on the old WEU functions. Denmark is the only opt-out of common defence. Finland and Sweden joined.
 

Unkraut

Master of the Inane Comment
Location
Germany
Surely we can do better than this lazy euphemism? [poking the Russian bear]
I dislike it too, like 'thowing the baby out with the bathwater'.
How about Putin and some of his actions?
I think following the breakup of the Soviet Union there was a chance to integrate Russia into a democratic way of life under the rule of law. This extended perhaps for some 15 years after 1991. It was squandered by the West who did little to help the countries of eastern Europe to dismantle the failed socialist command economies and replace it with a social market economy. They were left to flounder. The Americans in particular should take responsibility for assuming that 'the market' minus the social aspect would automatically sort out all of the inherited problems.

Move on to post 2005 and Putin gradually moved away from the newly won freedoms albeit still limited back in the direction of the old Soviet state, with increasing repression. Even Stalin has had limited rehabilitation. It may be the Anglo-Saxons increasingly liked 'poking', but the Germans certainly didn't, and significant increases in trade were considered to be a sure way of helping Russia go in a politically healthier direction. Merkel was taken in - something increasingly recognised, but Nord Stream 2 was heavily pushed by the social democrats in the grand coalition. The project was designed to get round gas from Russia having to go through the Ukraine.

Putin's actions have reversed in a single day about 30 years of German policy towards the east. The 2%+ NATO target, rearmament of the Bundeswehr and supplying weapons to the Ukraine. The speed of getting away from fossil fuel use will be increased, which long term will hit the Russian economy which is heavily dependent on trading these resources.

The hard left, Die Linke, have also had a wake up call. I cannot but wonder if there was a residual loyalty to the old Soviet Union amongst some in their ranks, after all Putin is a product of the Soviet Union.

I do not doubt that this is an unjust war, but there is no little hypocrisy in the condemnation of it by the West in view of the military interventions of more than dubious legality or morality in sundry parts of the world.
 

stowie

Active Member
except for the European Defence Agency which so many kippers objected to, and the related agencies and services formed after the EU took on the old WEU functions. Denmark is the only opt-out of common defence. Finland and Sweden joined.

Yes - although I always thought of this as more strategic co-operation on weapon development etc. But could be wrong.

If Russia invaded any particular EU country then they would be attacking one of the three major economic centres of the world. That in itself would have huge consequences
 

Solocle

New Member
Finland and Sweden are part of the EU. Although not a defense / military organisation, this would have profound consequences to the integrity of the EU which would reverberate around the world. As terrible as it is to say, I would image an invasion into EU nation states would trigger a much wider war in a similar way to an attack on a NATO country.
Article 42.7 of the Lisbon Treaty resembles NATO Article 5.
If a Member State is the victim of armed aggression on its territory, the other Member States shall have towards it an obligation of aid and assistance by all the means in their power, in accordance with Article 51 of the United Nations Charter. This shall not prejudice the specific character of the security and defence policy of certain Member States.

Commitments and cooperation in this area shall be consistent with commitments under the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, which, for those States which are members of it, remains the foundation of their collective defence and the forum for its implementation.
Since France has nuclear missiles, an attack on any EU member state would be liable to start a nuclear war.

Then an attack on France, or indeed any joint EU-NATO member, would pull us and the US in.
 
He hasn't threathened anyone though, just put out a message about putting the big nuclear boys on special alert. Meanwhile, he's NATO's and EU's greatest recruiter.
Correction Putin has put the Nuclear boys on special alert, his Foreign ministers is constanly saying ''a WW3 would be nuclear and devastating'' so techniucally not a threat, but it is a bit the same as someone saying ''i have put extra big tyres on my car to over-run persons on cycles, and then continueing to close-pass person on a cycle.

Finland and Sweden are part of the EU. Although not a defense / military organisation, this would have profound consequences to the integrity of the EU which would reverberate around the world. As terrible as it is to say, I would image an invasion into EU nation states would trigger a much wider war in a similar way to an attack on a NATO country.
Yes that where the ''Russian is the biggest recruiter rumors come from'' but the question is would it really happen? considering how mild the reaction is now after a few tiny vieled russian threaths that we technically can't call that way?

Article 42.7 of the Lisbon Treaty resembles NATO Article 5.

Since France has nuclear missiles, an attack on any EU member state would be liable to start a nuclear war.

Then an attack on France, or indeed any joint EU-NATO member, would pull us and the US in.
And the Uk altough not Eu anymore where still Nato as far as i'm aware. Having said that, would it really lead to an armed conflict of will economic sanctions do? Just as we apparently think that going to stop Russia in Ukraine..
 
OP
OP
Milzy

Milzy

Well-Known Member
What happens if Nuclear war happens & my house is still stood? Do I still have to pay a mortgage & would we get Furlough?
Also would Sheffield & Leeds be targeted?
I think it would be best to die quickly than struggle through a Nuclear winter.
 
Top Bottom