Yet more Tory sleaze….

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
OP
OP
Fab Foodie

Fab Foodie

Legendary Member
Earned is the wrong word. Deserves is probably a better word.
And whilst the Lords exists there needs to be peers to attend, so people need to be nominated. Whether you want it abolished or not.

I would think that Someone like Robert Winston deserves a place. He should be able of offer plenty of useful insight into complex medical and ethical matters from a non political viewpoint based on a life time of experience and expertise.
Admittedly he’s just one of many but there are exemptions.
I believe that Martin Lewis was nominated but was declined, which is an absolute scandal given the dross in there already.

I think the question of how to create a moderating, representative, and accountable second house is a whole new topic for debate!
 

Poacher

Regular
I would think that Someone like Robert Winston deserves a place. He should be able of offer plenty of useful insight into complex medical and ethical matters from a non political viewpoint based on a life time of experience and expertise.
Visceral cyclist hater Robert Winston?
The one who claims that cycle lanes are a major cause of pollution in London?
The one who has demanded compulsory registration of every bicycle, and that cyclists must be insured?
That Robert Winston?
 

Beebo

Guru
Visceral cyclist hater Robert Winston?
The one who claims that cycle lanes are a major cause of pollution in London?
The one who has demanded compulsory registration of every bicycle, and that cyclists must be insured?
That Robert Winston?

He can’t be right all the time. And I doubt be hates all cyclist.
But I think he got into an altercation with an aggressive cyclist once which may have annoyed him.
 

theclaud

Reading around the chip
But I think he got into an altercation with an aggressive cyclist once which may have annoyed him

Oh no. Wait til he finds out about motorists.
 
Top Bottom