AuroraSaab
Squire
OK. Just checking. I mean, organinising a huge demo at the family home of someone because you disagree with them, however emotive the issue, isn't something I imagine most people would support but there you go.
OK. Just checking. I mean, organinising a huge demo at the family home of someone because you disagree with them, however emotive the issue, isn't something I imagine most people would support but there you go.
I don't think the ancients were quite as lacking in knowledge from observation of life as we might think! The Hebrew and Greek words for an infant child refer both to children before and after birth. They are persons before birth - For thou didst form my inward parts,I don't think 'life starts at conception' (even if you accept this as true, which I don't) was an ancient or Biblical thing because surely the knowledge that it's the sperm meeting the egg didn't come till much later.
Yes we do have to deal with the world as it is I agree. I don't see why a biblical diagnosis of that world should automatically be out of order whilst the grown ups without it discuss the issues. You know - a religious person, idiot, doesn't have science and reason. One of my problems with this is that modern secularists assert that if a man says he is a woman, then he is (as you well know!) whilst at the same time being unable to give a definition of what a woman is.The trouble with saying that if we all followed the Bible there wouldn't be any rape or incest and thus no need for abortion is that, even if that were true, we have to deal with the world as it is now, where there is rape, poverty, serious foetal disability etc.
Abortion is now the leading cause of death worldwide. I believe I have read/heard that the majority of these are female.It is still a leading cause of death amongst women,
It is an interesting question but the answer, if there is one, doesn’t add much to the argument.It doesn't seem to me to be unreasonable to ask if life doesn't begin at conception, when does it begin.
As you well know, views on this topic (irrelevant here) are not divided along religious lines and there are a range of views completely unrelated to whether someone believes in a god or not.One of my problems with this is that modern secularists assert that if a man says he is a woman, then he is (as you well know!) whilst at the same time being unable to give a definition of what a woman is.
This is completely incorrect. Up to 11 weeks, abortion is medical not surgical. Your sermon giver is lying to provoke sensationalist outrage.1st trimester – vacuum pump is used or a sharp instrument or the head is crushed
You don't have to leave it because of people posting stuff like this..The irony of my feeling I have to leave the discussion because of posts made by religious moralists is not lost on me, just so you know.
Is irony the right word? Is there a term for irony that also means really bitter and shitty? I dunno, anyway you get my point.
But I would understand why you would..Roe v Wade is an American issue within that culture. Upthread American evangelicals were particularly criticised for their stance on this. I have listened to this constituency on and off for a long time, but below is a short summary of the beginning of a semon by John MacArthur, an elder statesman in the movement, given in light of recent developments supplemented by a couple of things from memory. It shows where they are coming from. I have kept their teminology:
One third of conceptions end in abortion. More are killed than born amongst married women
Planned parenthood – 'pregnancy is an STD and abortion is the cure'. Babies are now a disease?
You can do to a baby in the womb what it is illegal to do to your domestic pets
Methods
1st trimester – vacuum pump is used or a sharp instrument or the head is crushed
2nd – saline solution is used after amniotic fluid removed, baby is burned and dies. Stillbirth follows
3rd – Some states have introduced abortion up to full term. One blogger noted that when the legislation was passed feminists outside the govt building wept for joy. If this results in a live birth if botched, it is illegal to try to save the baby, who is put on a slab and left to die or killed. Some are used for research purposes – if I understood correctly whilst still alive. There have even been discussions of post-birth abortion.
This has sporned a huge and very profitable industry. One doctor alone with a turnover of $9 million a year. (Personal conversation with MacArthur)
Parents are kept in the dark over the ending of teenage pregnancies.
Information on the possible unhealthy affects of abortion.
'A holocaust of convenience killing'
You don't have to leave it because of people posting stuff like this..
But I would understand why you would..
it's not possible to have rational discussions with garbage
such as above flying around .
Especially when it's contributed by someone who won't even engage with many of the real live women on this thread, or their challenges..
.. Which is of course is quite telling in itself...
Claud gets 'told off' for calling someone a naughty name..
Mr @Unkraut gets a 'sensible' answer for posting garbage..
Same old same old..
I seem to have a very busy week / life coming up...
As a total none believer, I don’t agree with one word @Unkraut says, but, he has the right to believe it and say it (IMHO). You dismissing it as “garbage” says more about you than him.
Oops! Think I misplaced the ball for a minute there.
I have to give the benefit of the doubt on this one and declare that you are both correct.This is completely incorrect. Up to 11 weeks, abortion is medical not surgical. Your sermon giver is lying to provoke sensationalist outrage.
Maybe if the same men legislating over women's bodies also legislated to ensure that the men impregnating them provided full financial and emotional support for the rest of the child's life, the issue would be less contentious. If they are that desperate for women to give birth rather than have terminations, then a full package of financial and emotional support for that woman and child should also be mandatory.If the state is mandating enforced childbirth, why should it not pay for prenatal care, for the birth itself, for postnatal care, and – for babies who are not sold off to richer families – for the cost of bringing up the child?