This one makes no sense - as yet.
We are told a man, presumably the polis, was arrested after a member of the public saw a woman in distress.
Then, bang, he's charged with six rapes and other offences.
There's no way charges for six rapes could have been whipped up in 48 hours, he must have been under investigation for weeks, if not months - victims rightly complain the process takes too long.
It beggars belief even the Met would let a copper under suspicion of multiple rapes continue working as a polis, even though the story suggest he's only just been suspended.
A non-molestation order is usually made as an adjunct to a criminal conviction.
Even if this one wasn't. it also beggars belief the Met didn't know about it a good while before he was charged with breaching it, unless he breached it on the way home from the magistrates' court minutes after it was imposed.
I'm not inclined to bellow at the Met on this occasion - I suspect if we knew the full picture the investigation/arrest/charge sequence would make sense.
It's all a bit bonkers at the moment.