Laurence Fox vs Mukhtar

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Beebo

Veteran
Good old Lozza has finally crossed a line that even GB news can’t defend him.

To cap it all, he was appearing on suspected sex pest, Dan Wooton’s show.


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-66932538
 
OP
OP
winjim

winjim

Welcome yourself into the new modern crisis
Good old Lozza has finally crossed a line that even GB news can’t defend him.

To cap it all, he was appearing on suspected sex pest, Dan Wooton’s show.


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-66932538

It's too much entertainment for a work day. Wooton's issued a crocodile tears apology and in response Fox has released a screenshot of text messages between them.

Meanwhile Mukhtar's getting the popcorn out.


View: https://twitter.com/I_amMukhtar/status/1706978320154259908?t=9mQdQJdu2nUyX15vuehmwQ&s=19


I don't dare hope that it'll go anywhere but it is nice to imagine the entire GBNews edifice crumbling because of this.

And in possibly not unrelated news, Fox appears to be threatening to sue another black man for calling him a racist.


View: https://twitter.com/slondonuk/status/1706653757499420947?t=5wK5uFEOvsGs3D8zn1h5IA&s=19


Mukhtar of course says suck your mum.


View: https://twitter.com/I_amMukhtar/status/1706644253827363278?t=msTd2WtJIn08QEvljgWJsQ&s=19
 

Pale Rider

Veteran
Saying 'who'd shag it?' was a dreadful thing to say about the reporter.

Not least because I'm going to assert it was thoroughly inaccurate - I doubt she has any problems finding male company.

In terms of the other hacks in the parliamentary lobby, she probably qualifies as a stunner.
 
OP
OP
winjim

winjim

Welcome yourself into the new modern crisis
Saying 'who'd shag it?' was a dreadful thing to say about the reporter.

Not least because I'm going to assert it was thoroughly inaccurate - I doubt she has any problems finding male company.

In terms of the other hacks in the parliamentary lobby, she probably qualifies as a stunner.

That is absolutely the least reason and you know it. This is rage baiting, the same as Fox.
 

CXRAndy

Veteran
She is a regular on Piers Morgan show. Totally woke female. Her comments regarding male suicide brought the response from Laurence.

It's was crude, probably not likely, most males wouldn't turn down the chance. However long term she maybe rather difficult to get on with.

He was entitled to make his comments and it's upto him whether he sees there is a need to apologise.

I don't think she apologised regarding male suicide comments
 
OP
OP
winjim

winjim

Welcome yourself into the new modern crisis
She is a regular on Piers Morgan show. Totally woke female. Her comments regarding male suicide brought the response from Laurence.

It's was crude, probably not likely, most males wouldn't turn down the chance. However long term she maybe rather difficult to get on with.

He was entitled to make his comments and it's upto him whether he sees there is a need to apologise.

I don't think she apologised regarding male suicide comments

Evans didn't use the word 'apologise' but did say she had been rash in her response.

Wootton did use the word 'apologise' but was then shown to have misrepresented his opinion regarding Fox's comments.

Fox has doubled down on everything.

You've done the same as PR and as Fox in commenting on a woman's f*ckability. But you know all this.
 

Beebo

Veteran
I don't think she apologised regarding male suicide comments
I haven’t seen her comments, but understand that she didnt agree with a “minister for men” argument, as the mental health crisis endemic throughout the country, is not specific to men.

she then went on to suggest that “ a lot of ministers bandy this about to make an enemy out of women."

She has clarified on twitter that her comments had been "a little rash" and that she was "actually very interested in a brief for a minister on young men's mental health".
 
OP
OP
winjim

winjim

Welcome yourself into the new modern crisis
I haven’t seen her comments, but understand that she didnt agree with a “minister for men” argument, as the mental health crisis endemic throughout the country, is not specific to men.

she then went on to suggest that “ a lot of ministers bandy this about to make an enemy out of women."

She has clarified on twitter that her comments had been "a little rash" and that she was "actually very interested in a brief for a minister on young men's mental health".

That seems reasonable to me, but the important point is that nothing justifies speaking about a woman in the way they did. You can see from the pre-interview transcript that Fox released, that they intended this to be a hit job on her, they just took it a bit too far.
 
Top Bottom