D
Deleted member 159
Guest
There's no process. It was scrapped. What part of that do you not understand?
So they're not allowed in the country. If you arrive with no paperwork, you're illegal
There's no process. It was scrapped. What part of that do you not understand?
So they're not allowed in the country. If you arrive with no paperwork, you're illegal
There's no legal route, paperwork or not.
So they're not allowed in the country. If you arrive with no paperwork, you're illegal
Muslim gangs clashing with far far right public. Stabbings occuring
So don't come. You're not welcome, costing British taxpayers billions per year, bringing all sorts of problems
Overburden the health service, housing, crime.
Off course it does, for those who come in by legal routes. However, GDP goes up, but individual GDP goes down- suppressed wages for all except the super rich, who cream off the profits by having abundant low skilled workers flooding in.You do know that immigrants contribute more to the UK economy than the natives?
This has been proven.
You do know that immigrants contribute more to the UK economy than the natives?
This has been proven.
That's down to eastern European immigration, where the arrivals are mostly working and young. They are more economically active because the native cohort you are comparing them with has a large % of elderly who have woreasked and then retired. You're comparing 2 different cohorts.
So they're not allowed in the country. If you arrive with no paperwork, you're illegal
There's certainly an argument to be made for reform of asylum laws to allow arrivals to work after a certain period.That's one reason why, in economic terms, the relatively young people arriving here should be welcomed. If allowed to work their efforts and taxes will improve life for all of us.
Wouldn't they be eligible to come here on work visas, being employed in quite high salary industries? If they are claiming asylum, then their skills are irrelevant - refuge status should be about their need at the time not what the refugee can offer their host nation.In the last week alone I have been talking with an architect, a GP and an engineer, all of whom are prevented from working here, and are housed at our expense. Madness.
Wouldn't they be eligible to come here on work visas, being employed in quite high salary industries? If they are claiming asylum, then their skills are irrelevant - refuge status should be about their need at the time not what the refugee can offer their host nation.
There's certainly an argument to be made for reform of asylum laws to allow arrivals to work after a certain period.
Wouldn't they be eligible to come here on work visas, being employed in quite high salary industries? If they are claiming asylum, then their skills are irrelevant - refuge status should be about their need at the time not what the refugee can offer their host nation.
If you have been discovered in a same sex relationship or have been caught by police producing anti-government literature, for example, you may not have time to plan your escape...
I take the point about skills being irrelevant to asylum, but I want to challenge the lazy view that the people arriving here are uniformly low skilled.
People generally seek asylum when there is serious risk to their life. Going through the strict bureaucratic process of finding a vacancy and a UK sponsor for one of the approved skills is a luxury they can’t afford.