Gender again. Sorry!

[AndyRM]

Did you not spot the link through to the actual report?

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44192-025-00216-3

Yes.

And I thought my initial comment about it summed up my opinion on it, but apparently not.

 

[AuroraSaab]

Im disappointed, but not the least surprised, that none of you Trans Rights Activists have anything to say about the report which catalogued the harms caused by cross sex hormones. Cat got your tongues?

That would require thinking about both the broader implications and the details. Most of the Naca gents prefer to think only about their own limited male experience. They have no curiosity about why 35% of kids referred to gender clinics had moderate to severe autistic traits or why 90% of the girls referred were gay, or concern that suicide rates go up in those that surgically transition.

For several of the men who contribute on here women's spaces and services are looked on as a reward for men who have made an effort to perform femininity. They don't really look beyond that to the implications for everyone else.

 

[Bromptonaut]

Did you not spot the link through to the actual report?

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44192-025-00216-3

Only read the abstract so far which seems to aver that, as might be expected, oestrogen has side effects some of which are listed.

They need further research seems to be the conclusion.

 

[bobzmyunkle]

Decathlon point for Stonewall?

 

[mickle]

Yes.

And I thought my initial comment about it summed up my opinion on it, but apparently not.

You dont seem to care about the harm caused by cross sex hormones.