AndyRM
Elder Goth
Yes.
And I thought my initial comment about it summed up my opinion on it, but apparently not.
Gender again. Sorry!
- Thread starter theclaud
- Start date
Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
Yes.
And I thought my initial comment about it summed up my opinion on it, but apparently not.
AuroraSaab
Shaman
That would require thinking about both the broader implications and the details. Most of the Naca gents prefer to think only about their own limited male experience. They have no curiosity about why 35% of kids referred to gender clinics had moderate to severe autistic traits or why 90% of the girls referred were gay, or concern that suicide rates go up in those that surgically transition.
For several of the men who contribute on here women's spaces and services are looked on as a reward for men who have made an effort to perform femininity. They don't really look beyond that to the implications for everyone else.
Bromptonaut
Rohan Man
- Location
- Bugbrooke, Northants
Only read the abstract so far which seems to aver that, as might be expected, oestrogen has side effects some of which are listed.
They need further research seems to be the conclusion.
bobzmyunkle
Über Member
mickle
Member
You dont seem to care about the harm caused by cross sex hormones.
CXRAndy
Guru
Non of them do. Monkers was let them decide. Children with autism, dysphoria broken families making life altering decisions, from which there is no return
AndyRM
Elder Goth
I don't know what it is that I've said which has led you to that conclusion.
mickle
Member
You've said nothing. Which is my point. I can only hope that you're beginning to realise that your position in defence of the cult of transgenderism is untenable.
