Spot-On Dutchie - and I never thought I'd say that about one of your posts!
It'll be misery for financiers, and big business which have knowingly poisoned the planet and created all them rich people - that sure is a calamity.
No but rich poeple are able to avoid negative consequences longer then poor people. And behind big oil there are indeed a few poeple who got very rich knowing very well what damage they or better said their companies caused. same can be said for battery production, oil lines in the niger delta etc.
And it will shift the problem to other countries - yep, can't disagree there either...but which problem do you foresee shifting to other countries by stopping oil and gas investment?
For example investments in technologies that are not ready for such big investments yet, just because a stupid goal. We can't live without gas oil or coals for now, so just stopping it will not nullify demand so it has to come from someone else, the last time we needed gas from somewhere else we got it from Russia..
Do you mean making other countries unfarmable? Uninhabitable? Burnt to a crisp? Would you prefer that islands and lovely Florida disappear underwater, or witness the collapse of the Mediterranean holiday industry? The forced migration of peoples and nations? Starvation on a scale as yet unseen? Death of the great barrier reef, intense flooding and destruction in other lands?
Please be clear...
Nature is better in burning things to a crisp/flooding it/shake it into pieces etc. which goes to show where all just visitors here if nature is done with us no matter what technologies we have, we all be eliminated.
But no i don't mean that, i mean we need more common sense not following a few simple sentences i think we saved the planet. But also we need to disagree more, great inventions did not came because 98% of the scientist carefully cherry picked agreed the wheel should be round. it came from trial and error agreeing and disagreeing as it where with all great inventions soluttions and so on.