The same kind of compromise "we" have accepted with respect to
America's "war crimes", perhaps?
Beyond the royal "we", think it is also important to remember that outside the "West", the stance with respect to the war's cause and conduct is somewhat less partisan and more nuanced, if you will (e.g. they remember the famous "shock and awe" tactics a certain country was very proud of, against some dark-skinned targets). To put it in perspective, countries that are sanctioning Russia (in yellow below) represent c12% of the global population:
View attachment 2728
Are they mad? They are, if you can also reconcile how "we" cast this fight (and "our" other fights around the world) as a fight of "democracy vs autocracy" with:
View attachment 2729
To answer the question as to what might be the eventual compromise acceptable to the participants in this proxy war when they all have had enough (which can take years if not decades - just look at Korea), I see no reason why it can't go back to something like a Minsk 1/2. It is because in terms of overarching status (if one can tune out the rhetoric and accusations) it remains impossible to argue against the fact that
"Ukraine will either be Permanently Neutral or Permanently Divided".
In the meantime, keep warm, keep safe!